/man_with_bouquet_1.gif "Selected Clipart:")
pappu
12-16 03:37 PM
I'snt tracker broken (Sorting by PD ) for some time now.
We will improve it soon. But the data is still useful.
We will improve it soon. But the data is still useful.
wallpaper Selected Clipart:
gc007
09-01 10:24 AM
Since 1999. GC filled Mar 2003 EB3
apb
09-16 12:52 AM
Bump
2011 #42386 Clip Art Graphic of a
deepimpact
08-23 03:18 PM
My friend, "USA point of view is multinational executives can potentially create jobs", but the reality is the other way round. They are here to to make the transition happen from Onshore to Offshore. I have complete knowledge on how this EB1 thing works , as I was one of them once upon a time before taking up my current job.
I'll stop and leave it here....
The original intention of EB1 (all three categories) was to have exceptional contributors like scientists/researchers/managers, etch to have highest priority in getting GC. Now over time people have found out loop holes as the language of the requirement criteria has a lot of ambiguity. I guess intention of the current memo is to over scrutinize the claims in these applications to ensure that only genuine candidates qualify. Again this is not fool proof and people will find a roundabout. The desparate condition of the EB green card waiting list is causing people to try and move to the higher preferance category either by using correct means or by using loopholes.
I'll stop and leave it here....
The original intention of EB1 (all three categories) was to have exceptional contributors like scientists/researchers/managers, etch to have highest priority in getting GC. Now over time people have found out loop holes as the language of the requirement criteria has a lot of ambiguity. I guess intention of the current memo is to over scrutinize the claims in these applications to ensure that only genuine candidates qualify. Again this is not fool proof and people will find a roundabout. The desparate condition of the EB green card waiting list is causing people to try and move to the higher preferance category either by using correct means or by using loopholes.
more...
ramus
09-09 11:50 AM
Thanks a lot.. Wish you could come to rally but understand your prior commitement...
Thank you..
Paypal contribution of $300. I cannot make it to the rally because of prior commitments. Thanks to all who are going to be at the rally in person.
I feel good after making the contribution. Hopefully, several others will join this contribution drive and experience this good feeling first hand.
Good luck to all.
Thank you..
Paypal contribution of $300. I cannot make it to the rally because of prior commitments. Thanks to all who are going to be at the rally in person.
I feel good after making the contribution. Hopefully, several others will join this contribution drive and experience this good feeling first hand.
Good luck to all.
wandmaker
05-22 07:40 AM
Come forward and contribute for your own cause.
santb1975: Change the thread title to read as FUNDING DRIVE: Let us step up IV(I+We)'ans
santb1975: Change the thread title to read as FUNDING DRIVE: Let us step up IV(I+We)'ans
more...
maverick_s39
09-15 04:18 PM
gctest, personally I don't see any issue with eb3 to eb2 porting, look at the porting opportunity from eb3 applicant's point of view, these applicants are waiting since 2001 for GCs but EB2 applicant with PDs 2005 are getting GCs, eb3 to eb2 porting is a way for them to jump ahead of 2006 eb2 filers and get their GCs, I don't see anything wrong with it, sure it causes 2003/04 eb2 filers (very few I guess) to wait a little longer but every law has a loophole and we just have to live with it,
How many eb2 filers are really qualified for eb2 labors? I see lot of consulting firms abusing eb2 labors and lot of people who are playing the game fair are left behind, I feel porting labor is a way to level the playing field, also people who filed eb3 labors in 2001, 2002 are qualified for 2005 eb2 labor anyway, just think these applicants file eb2 labor in 2005, as you said if they are not eligible they will be denied to use the opportunity and its OK if you wait a little longer
How many eb2 filers are really qualified for eb2 labors? I see lot of consulting firms abusing eb2 labors and lot of people who are playing the game fair are left behind, I feel porting labor is a way to level the playing field, also people who filed eb3 labors in 2001, 2002 are qualified for 2005 eb2 labor anyway, just think these applicants file eb2 labor in 2005, as you said if they are not eligible they will be denied to use the opportunity and its OK if you wait a little longer
2010 Pipe Smoking Man clip art
rajuram
05-24 10:42 PM
Thanks for the information. Bills come and go every year, hard to count how many we have seen go up in the air in the last 3 years.
We are talking about HR 5882,5921 and 6039. Very few people are working very hard to take all of us a step ahead with the GC process and we have lots of hope and we also have direction. Please check with your state chapter lead for latest updates.
We are talking about HR 5882,5921 and 6039. Very few people are working very hard to take all of us a step ahead with the GC process and we have lots of hope and we also have direction. Please check with your state chapter lead for latest updates.
more...
pcs
07-05 03:40 PM
Guys meet your Congressman !!!
hair KLEC: Clipart
gc_on_demand
09-11 05:11 PM
Dear Freinds,
USCIS has proven again that they cannot calculate or count. Don't you think they should be presented with this calculator to help them calculate.
http://www.amazon.com/REALLY-CALCULATOR-AUTO-OFF-RUBBER-KEYPAD/dp/B000QOJYWA/ref=pd_bbs_1?ie=UTF8&s=office-products&qid=1221162014&sr=8-1
Also DOS has a knack for turning back the clock, don't you think they are in need of this clock.
http://www.amazon.com/American-Science-Surplus-BACKWARDS-RUNNING/dp/B000KDYQFM
What is your opinion?
What we are expecting after this calc. camp ? I dont think so they will revise bulletin nor they will give single extra visa above 140k. I think we should focus on HR 5882 .. We should send something to lawmakers.
Just a thought.
USCIS has proven again that they cannot calculate or count. Don't you think they should be presented with this calculator to help them calculate.
http://www.amazon.com/REALLY-CALCULATOR-AUTO-OFF-RUBBER-KEYPAD/dp/B000QOJYWA/ref=pd_bbs_1?ie=UTF8&s=office-products&qid=1221162014&sr=8-1
Also DOS has a knack for turning back the clock, don't you think they are in need of this clock.
http://www.amazon.com/American-Science-Surplus-BACKWARDS-RUNNING/dp/B000KDYQFM
What is your opinion?
What we are expecting after this calc. camp ? I dont think so they will revise bulletin nor they will give single extra visa above 140k. I think we should focus on HR 5882 .. We should send something to lawmakers.
Just a thought.
more...
gc_on_demand
12-11 05:06 PM
Administration may not want to add that right now. I had poll long back to find out many of us are interested into it . Only few replied , with limited resources we cannot achieve any thing.
IV core had same and similar job , AC21 on agenda for this year's agenda. FOIA was small side project at that time.
Now coming to main point ... We see so many news that CIR is coming in early 2010. Administration may not want to add pre registration at that time when CIR passes and all dates become C for 2- 3 years. Then this pre registration will not help as long as you have labor approved. Whole admin fix is based on rule making process and that takes near to 6 months. Also new forms and new memo to all CIS dis offices. Way too for CIS my friend. They can be only on track with new process after year.
If we could have done that last year then it might be helpful. Even I recently did some research and found that Pre registration process that those lawyers talks to attract us is for H1B. CIS wants to implement for H1B and then try out for other non immi worker category and then for Green card applicants. I bet you we will get GC by then.
So we can contribute to IV and have IV to work on our stuff. Removal of country cap , STEM , Recapture etc.. That should easy line for all of us ( EB2 and EB3 )
IV core had same and similar job , AC21 on agenda for this year's agenda. FOIA was small side project at that time.
Now coming to main point ... We see so many news that CIR is coming in early 2010. Administration may not want to add pre registration at that time when CIR passes and all dates become C for 2- 3 years. Then this pre registration will not help as long as you have labor approved. Whole admin fix is based on rule making process and that takes near to 6 months. Also new forms and new memo to all CIS dis offices. Way too for CIS my friend. They can be only on track with new process after year.
If we could have done that last year then it might be helpful. Even I recently did some research and found that Pre registration process that those lawyers talks to attract us is for H1B. CIS wants to implement for H1B and then try out for other non immi worker category and then for Green card applicants. I bet you we will get GC by then.
So we can contribute to IV and have IV to work on our stuff. Removal of country cap , STEM , Recapture etc.. That should easy line for all of us ( EB2 and EB3 )
hot Man - Retro Clip Art
chanduv23
06-10 09:35 AM
Come on folks, lets burn those phone lines.
Try try try till you succeed
Try try try till you succeed
more...
house his feetquot; clip art image
malaGCPahije
10-17 10:07 AM
Everyone who contributed to this have done a great job. Hopefully USCIS takes a note of this and rectifies their process in the future. I will send the letters soon. Thanks to each one of you for the efforts.
tattoo exercise clip art.
amitjoey
07-18 09:51 PM
Thanks a bunch for all of you who contributed today, I read each and every post and felt very content that atleast there are people who feel the same way like I feel. IV is the only org that stands for us. It is time to strengthen it, Most of you have no idea how much money is really needed for lobbying, and how far it can take us if each of us contributed a little every month.
Minimum $50/month.
Minimum $50/month.
more...
pictures Selected Clipart:
makemygc
07-06 12:06 PM
The Visa Bulletin for July 2007 must be read in conjunction with the Update of July Visa Availability.
http://travel.state.gov/visa/frvi/bulletin/bulletin_3263.html
I don't know why they changed it suddenly.
They have just linked the two things together making it more explicit.
http://travel.state.gov/visa/frvi/bulletin/bulletin_3263.html
I don't know why they changed it suddenly.
They have just linked the two things together making it more explicit.
dresses #29906 Clip Art Graphic of a
sounakc
07-16 12:44 AM
how do i do it online..? please help
more...
makeup Men Women Bathroom clip art
dvb123
09-13 06:35 PM
Sec. 42. 53 Priority date of individual applicants.
(a) Preference applicant . The priority date of a preference visa applicant under INA 203 (a) or (b) shall be the filing date of the approved petition that accorded preference status.
(b) Former Western Hemisphere applicant with priority date prior to January 1, 1977 . Notwithstanding the provisions of paragraph (a) of this section, an alien who, prior to January 1, 1977, was subject to the numerical limitation specified in section 21(e) of the Act of October 3, 1965, and who was registered as a Western Hemisphere immigrant with a priority date prior to January 1, 1977, shall retain that priority date as a preference immigrant upon approval of a petition according status under INA 203 (a) or (b) .
(c) Derivative priority date for spouse or child of principal alien . A spouse or child of a principal alien acquired prior to the principal alien's admission shall be entitled to the priority date of the principal alien, whether or not named in the immigrant visa application of the principal alien. A child born of a marriage which existed at the time of a principal alien's admission to the United States is considered to have been acquired prior to the principal alien's admission. Sec. 42. 53 Priority date of individual applicants.
(a) Preference applicant . The priority date of a preference visa applicant under INA 203 (a) or (b) shall be the filing date of the approved petition that accorded preference status.
(b) Former Western Hemisphere applicant with priority date prior to January 1, 1977 . Notwithstanding the provisions of paragraph (a) of this section, an alien who, prior to January 1, 1977, was subject to the numerical limitation specified in section 21(e) of the Act of October 3, 1965, and who was registered as a Western Hemisphere immigrant with a priority date prior to January 1, 1977, shall retain that priority date as a preference immigrant upon approval of a petition according status under INA 203 (a) or (b) .
(c) Derivative priority date for spouse or child of principal alien . A spouse or child of a principal alien acquired prior to the principal alien's admission shall be entitled to the priority date of the principal alien, whether or not named in the immigrant visa application of the principal alien. A child born of a marriage which existed at the time of a principal alien's admission to the United States is considered to have been acquired prior to the principal alien's admission.
(a) Preference applicant . The priority date of a preference visa applicant under INA 203 (a) or (b) shall be the filing date of the approved petition that accorded preference status.
(b) Former Western Hemisphere applicant with priority date prior to January 1, 1977 . Notwithstanding the provisions of paragraph (a) of this section, an alien who, prior to January 1, 1977, was subject to the numerical limitation specified in section 21(e) of the Act of October 3, 1965, and who was registered as a Western Hemisphere immigrant with a priority date prior to January 1, 1977, shall retain that priority date as a preference immigrant upon approval of a petition according status under INA 203 (a) or (b) .
(c) Derivative priority date for spouse or child of principal alien . A spouse or child of a principal alien acquired prior to the principal alien's admission shall be entitled to the priority date of the principal alien, whether or not named in the immigrant visa application of the principal alien. A child born of a marriage which existed at the time of a principal alien's admission to the United States is considered to have been acquired prior to the principal alien's admission. Sec. 42. 53 Priority date of individual applicants.
(a) Preference applicant . The priority date of a preference visa applicant under INA 203 (a) or (b) shall be the filing date of the approved petition that accorded preference status.
(b) Former Western Hemisphere applicant with priority date prior to January 1, 1977 . Notwithstanding the provisions of paragraph (a) of this section, an alien who, prior to January 1, 1977, was subject to the numerical limitation specified in section 21(e) of the Act of October 3, 1965, and who was registered as a Western Hemisphere immigrant with a priority date prior to January 1, 1977, shall retain that priority date as a preference immigrant upon approval of a petition according status under INA 203 (a) or (b) .
(c) Derivative priority date for spouse or child of principal alien . A spouse or child of a principal alien acquired prior to the principal alien's admission shall be entitled to the priority date of the principal alien, whether or not named in the immigrant visa application of the principal alien. A child born of a marriage which existed at the time of a principal alien's admission to the United States is considered to have been acquired prior to the principal alien's admission.
girlfriend Selected Clipart:
docp
04-30 02:44 PM
anything with window media player
hairstyles Gingerbread Man Clipart #17126
priti8888
07-23 03:30 PM
my PD were current in 2005.
One thing is confirmed:
When PD are "current" they approve cases based on RD.
My guess is in Oct or Nov 2007 PD would retrogress to jan/may-2004 for EB3 India. So hang in there guys!!..They will approve a lot of cases with older RD by Sept 30. They are hell bent on not wasting any visa numbers henceforth.
One thing is confirmed:
When PD are "current" they approve cases based on RD.
My guess is in Oct or Nov 2007 PD would retrogress to jan/may-2004 for EB3 India. So hang in there guys!!..They will approve a lot of cases with older RD by Sept 30. They are hell bent on not wasting any visa numbers henceforth.
hopefullegalimmigrant
01-07 04:19 PM
I am going to use AP as my backup> I will be going in for H stamping in India
Macaca
09-12 04:11 PM
Greg Aamot
JIM ABRAMS
JOSE MARIA ALVAREZ
CHARLES BABINGTON: cbabington@ap.org *
WOODY BAIRD
MATTHEW BARAKAT
JULIANA BARBASSA
DEVLIN BARRETT
JACQUES BILLEAUD
REBECCA BOONE
LYNN BREZOSKY
Garance Burke
DESMOND BUTLER
ALICIA A. CALDWELL
TRACI CARL
JOHN CHRISTOFFERSEN
DAVID CRARY
MARYCLAIRE DALE
JULIE HIRSCHFELD DAVIS: jdavis@ap.org *
JIM DAVENPORT
Giovanna Dell'Orto
ALEX DOMINGUEZ
Kirstin Downey
ELIZABETH DWOSKIN
BEN EVANS
BRENDAN FARRINGTON
BEN FELLER
RON FOURNIER rfournier@ap.org
Alan Fram afram@ap.org
Anabelle Garay
OSKAR GARCIA
SUZANNE GAMBOA: sgamboa@ap.org *
JON GAMBRELL
ANDREW GLAZER
ANABELLE GARAY
DEEPTI HAJELA
ROXANA HEGEMAN
JOHN HEILPRIN
TOM HESTER Jr.
ROBERT JABLON
Henry C. Jackson
GENE JOHNSON
MARCUS KABEL
SARAH KARUSH
RACHEL KONRAD rkonrad@ap.org *
Lisa Leff
STEVE LeBLANC
SCOTT LINDLAW
TRAVIS LOLLER
AMY LORENTZEN
JANET FRANKSTON LORIN
NORMA LOVEA
JENNIFER LOVEN jloven@ap.org
JOANN LOVIGLIO
Jeremiah Marquez
BARRY MASSEY
KAREN MATTHEWS
William McCall
HOLBROOK MOHR
GABRIELA MOLINA
Amanda Lee Myers
LARRY NEUMEISTER
DAISY NGUYEN
STEPHEN OHLEMACHER
ISTRA PACHECO
JOHN PORRETTO
PETER PRENGAMAN pprengaman@ap.org
LIBBY QUAID
TRAVIS REED
DEB RIECHMANN
MICHELLE ROBERTS
JORDAN ROBERTSON
OLGA R. RODRIGUEZ
ARTHUR H. ROTSTEIN
Michael Rubinkam
ANGELA DELLI SANTI
SUSANNE M. SCHAFER
MARK SCOLFORO
MICHAEL J. SNIFFEN
ELLIOT SPAGAT
MITCH STACY
TIM SULLIVAN
Nafeesa Syeed
CHRIS TALBOTT
JENNIFER TALHELM
TIM TALLEY
Sophia Tareen
MICHAEL TARM
ANDREW TAYLOR
CHRISTOPHER TOOTHAKER
JULIE WATSON
CHRISTOPHER WEBER: cweber@ap.org
WILL WEISSERT
Laura Wides-Munoz
Matt Yancey: 202/776.9403 or myancey@ap.org *
Email pattern: firstNameInitiallastName@ap.org
JIM ABRAMS
JOSE MARIA ALVAREZ
CHARLES BABINGTON: cbabington@ap.org *
WOODY BAIRD
MATTHEW BARAKAT
JULIANA BARBASSA
DEVLIN BARRETT
JACQUES BILLEAUD
REBECCA BOONE
LYNN BREZOSKY
Garance Burke
DESMOND BUTLER
ALICIA A. CALDWELL
TRACI CARL
JOHN CHRISTOFFERSEN
DAVID CRARY
MARYCLAIRE DALE
JULIE HIRSCHFELD DAVIS: jdavis@ap.org *
JIM DAVENPORT
Giovanna Dell'Orto
ALEX DOMINGUEZ
Kirstin Downey
ELIZABETH DWOSKIN
BEN EVANS
BRENDAN FARRINGTON
BEN FELLER
RON FOURNIER rfournier@ap.org
Alan Fram afram@ap.org
Anabelle Garay
OSKAR GARCIA
SUZANNE GAMBOA: sgamboa@ap.org *
JON GAMBRELL
ANDREW GLAZER
ANABELLE GARAY
DEEPTI HAJELA
ROXANA HEGEMAN
JOHN HEILPRIN
TOM HESTER Jr.
ROBERT JABLON
Henry C. Jackson
GENE JOHNSON
MARCUS KABEL
SARAH KARUSH
RACHEL KONRAD rkonrad@ap.org *
Lisa Leff
STEVE LeBLANC
SCOTT LINDLAW
TRAVIS LOLLER
AMY LORENTZEN
JANET FRANKSTON LORIN
NORMA LOVEA
JENNIFER LOVEN jloven@ap.org
JOANN LOVIGLIO
Jeremiah Marquez
BARRY MASSEY
KAREN MATTHEWS
William McCall
HOLBROOK MOHR
GABRIELA MOLINA
Amanda Lee Myers
LARRY NEUMEISTER
DAISY NGUYEN
STEPHEN OHLEMACHER
ISTRA PACHECO
JOHN PORRETTO
PETER PRENGAMAN pprengaman@ap.org
LIBBY QUAID
TRAVIS REED
DEB RIECHMANN
MICHELLE ROBERTS
JORDAN ROBERTSON
OLGA R. RODRIGUEZ
ARTHUR H. ROTSTEIN
Michael Rubinkam
ANGELA DELLI SANTI
SUSANNE M. SCHAFER
MARK SCOLFORO
MICHAEL J. SNIFFEN
ELLIOT SPAGAT
MITCH STACY
TIM SULLIVAN
Nafeesa Syeed
CHRIS TALBOTT
JENNIFER TALHELM
TIM TALLEY
Sophia Tareen
MICHAEL TARM
ANDREW TAYLOR
CHRISTOPHER TOOTHAKER
JULIE WATSON
CHRISTOPHER WEBER: cweber@ap.org
WILL WEISSERT
Laura Wides-Munoz
Matt Yancey: 202/776.9403 or myancey@ap.org *
Email pattern: firstNameInitiallastName@ap.org
No comments:
Post a Comment