vijay0101
01-21 11:15 PM
Hi guys,
my friend's situation is like this
1) EB2 is approved through spouse and I-485 is pending ....priority date for this is March 2005
in the mean time EB1- 140 is approved.
so my question is
1) can i apply another 485 while the 1st 485 is pending... ?
2) should I go ahed and apply for new 485 with EB1 any suggestion's are welcome.
Thanks
my friend's situation is like this
1) EB2 is approved through spouse and I-485 is pending ....priority date for this is March 2005
in the mean time EB1- 140 is approved.
so my question is
1) can i apply another 485 while the 1st 485 is pending... ?
2) should I go ahed and apply for new 485 with EB1 any suggestion's are welcome.
Thanks
wallpaper Kristen Stewart and 2011 MTV
waitnwatch
07-18 04:56 PM
In the right hand column on the homepage the threads used to be listed in chronological order with the one containing the last post on top.
Now it has changed so that I get the threads listed randomly.
Tech gurus - is there a way to fix this so that I can see the latest post on top like I used to previously.
Please help!!!!!!!!!!!
Now it has changed so that I get the threads listed randomly.
Tech gurus - is there a way to fix this so that I can see the latest post on top like I used to previously.
Please help!!!!!!!!!!!
RadioactveChimp
04-16 12:03 PM
explain to me what this s, I like it, but needs some explaination =)
2011 house Emma Stone at 2011 MTV Movie kristen stewart 2011 mtv movie awards.
iam4u4ever
02-12 05:25 PM
AFAIK you do not need any documents as far as you have an onward connecting flight out of
Dubai. It is very simple. You do not need to worry about anything.
Dubai. It is very simple. You do not need to worry about anything.
more...
phillyag
02-13 12:25 PM
Which Form should I look for getting this information?
I was using ETA Form 9089 page 11 0 Job duties. Is that the correct place to looks for ?
My company
I was using ETA Form 9089 page 11 0 Job duties. Is that the correct place to looks for ?
My company
ysramu
01-02 02:05 PM
My AP approvals are lost in mail, my employer mailed them in ordinary mail during holiday season (12/11/07). What can I do next? Go thru attorney for duplicates? Please advice.
more...
Blog Feeds
08-02 07:10 AM
Immigration Lawyers Blog Has Just Posted the Following:
USCIS has announced that beginning October 1, 2010, domestic offices and U.S. territories, including the U.S. Virgin Islands and Guam, will no longer be accepting cash payments. Other payment options will include money orders, credit cards, and checks (including personal checks).
http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/ImmigrationLawyersBlog/~4/ZK9BnhuCOWE
More... (http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ImmigrationLawyersBlog/~3/ZK9BnhuCOWE/uscis_changes_payment_options.html)
USCIS has announced that beginning October 1, 2010, domestic offices and U.S. territories, including the U.S. Virgin Islands and Guam, will no longer be accepting cash payments. Other payment options will include money orders, credit cards, and checks (including personal checks).
http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/ImmigrationLawyersBlog/~4/ZK9BnhuCOWE
More... (http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ImmigrationLawyersBlog/~3/ZK9BnhuCOWE/uscis_changes_payment_options.html)
2010 makeup 2011 MTV Movie Awards kristen stewart 2011 mtv movie awards.
svam77
09-23 05:59 PM
Hello All,
My checks got deposited on Friday and when I checked my wife's I 485 status with the LIN # on the back of the check, it said that the finger printing fee was rejected and that the case is now in suspense.
It said that I have to submit a new fee and that the case will be resumed again.
Do you know why this happened. My bank statement says that the finger printing check for her got deposited.
So if there is a mistake in the check, would they still deposit it ? And would her EAD application get processed even if the finger printing fee is wrong ?
Did this happen for anyone ?
Sam
My checks got deposited on Friday and when I checked my wife's I 485 status with the LIN # on the back of the check, it said that the finger printing fee was rejected and that the case is now in suspense.
It said that I have to submit a new fee and that the case will be resumed again.
Do you know why this happened. My bank statement says that the finger printing check for her got deposited.
So if there is a mistake in the check, would they still deposit it ? And would her EAD application get processed even if the finger printing fee is wrong ?
Did this happen for anyone ?
Sam
more...
freddyCR
February 5th, 2005, 05:41 PM
This is the name of this beautiful Church, dedicated to the patron Virgin of Costa Rica, located in the city of Cartago.
Her name and image are linked to multiple miraculous healings, and it is the destiny of a national pilgrimage, every August 10 th.
Hope you like them. As always, any comment is welcome.
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v629/alcorjr2/cartago1Medium.jpg
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v629/alcorjr2/DSCF3365_1Medium.jpg
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v629/alcorjr2/DSCF3368_1Medium.jpg
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v629/alcorjr2/DSCF3360_1Medium.jpg
Her name and image are linked to multiple miraculous healings, and it is the destiny of a national pilgrimage, every August 10 th.
Hope you like them. As always, any comment is welcome.
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v629/alcorjr2/cartago1Medium.jpg
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v629/alcorjr2/DSCF3365_1Medium.jpg
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v629/alcorjr2/DSCF3368_1Medium.jpg
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v629/alcorjr2/DSCF3360_1Medium.jpg
hair Kristen Stewart#39;s 2011 MTV
gconmymind
09-28 05:42 PM
I agree...there is no point. People who get it get it, others have to wait much longer....
more...
chilushah
02-19 11:36 PM
All,
Just Received a copy of my ETA 7089 from my HR. I learned that my Labor Cert may not have been properly filed.
The experience column
H6 - Is experience required in the job offered required for the JOB?
is NO
H14 - Specific Skills or other requirements says:
Qualifications include:
1) Five years of experience in Web Development ... and so on
H14 and H6 Contradict themselves...
My HR is dumb and the attorney had made mistakes for simple H1b filings in the past..
Any help/suggestions will be appreciated!
Thanks all in advance
Just Received a copy of my ETA 7089 from my HR. I learned that my Labor Cert may not have been properly filed.
The experience column
H6 - Is experience required in the job offered required for the JOB?
is NO
H14 - Specific Skills or other requirements says:
Qualifications include:
1) Five years of experience in Web Development ... and so on
H14 and H6 Contradict themselves...
My HR is dumb and the attorney had made mistakes for simple H1b filings in the past..
Any help/suggestions will be appreciated!
Thanks all in advance
hot Kristen Stewart And Robert
immidude
06-25 08:33 PM
anybody know how long it will take to receive receipt after filing I-140 in premium processing
more...
house by Lisa,. Kristen Stewart
kalyan
07-12 08:32 AM
Talk to an attorney he should be able to kiss your employer's ass with lot of things.
If your employer is paying more than what is mentioned in H1B, then you cannot do anything.
If you are working on % basis, then forget about 14k if till you work for him, prorate of H1B pay is paid.
If your employer is paying more than what is mentioned in H1B, then you cannot do anything.
If you are working on % basis, then forget about 14k if till you work for him, prorate of H1B pay is paid.
tattoo girlfriend Gallery Index: 2011 MTV Movie kristen stewart 2011 mtv movie
arnet
10-19 02:27 PM
bump /\/\
more...
pictures 2011 MTV Movie Awards: Robert
cj4ualways
09-14 05:12 PM
Thanks a bunch
dresses Kristen Stewart MTV Movie
Blog Feeds
03-19 10:40 AM
Just released from the Press Secretary's Office: In June, I met with members of both parties, and assigned Secretary Napolitano to work with them and key constituencies around the country to craft a comprehensive approach that will finally fix our broken immigration system. I am pleased to see that Senators Schumer and Graham have produced a promising, bipartisan framework which can and should be the basis for moving forward. It thoughtfully addresses the need to shore up our borders, and demands accountability from both workers who are here illegally and employers who game the system. My Administration will be consulting...
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2010/03/president-praises-schumergraham-framework.html)
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2010/03/president-praises-schumergraham-framework.html)
more...
makeup kristen stewart 2011 mtv
kirupa
04-17 06:50 AM
You can export the cube with only the outlines and then export the cube without the outlines and just the fill. Incorporate both animations into Flash, and you should be able to manipulate them both as you choose.
girlfriend images Kristen Stewart 2011 MTV Movie kristen stewart 2011 mtv movie awards.
Apollon
03-18 03:23 PM
Tried to post in another, old thread - no response for several days, so decided to create a new one.
I asked my employer to create sub-account for me at http://www.plc.doleta.gov so I could check my PERM case status without polling them. The employer got back to me and said "looked into the site and I couldn�t find the way to create user account to view your case only".
They dont mind making sub-account for me, same way they do for attorneys and paralegals, but they dont want me to see their other pending cases or any information, unrelated to my case. So, my question is: is there a way to create sub-account, which would allow seeing my own case only?
Thanks in advance.
I asked my employer to create sub-account for me at http://www.plc.doleta.gov so I could check my PERM case status without polling them. The employer got back to me and said "looked into the site and I couldn�t find the way to create user account to view your case only".
They dont mind making sub-account for me, same way they do for attorneys and paralegals, but they dont want me to see their other pending cases or any information, unrelated to my case. So, my question is: is there a way to create sub-account, which would allow seeing my own case only?
Thanks in advance.
hairstyles 2011 MTV Movie Awards Red
axp817
01-04 03:25 PM
Has anyone been in a situation where they joined a new employer after having completed 180 days after 485-filing, and sent in AC-21 documentation through an attorney?
If so, which attorney did you choose for the AC-21 paperwork?
- The old attorney, that represented you and your ex-employer, and filed your labor, 140, 485, EAD, AP
- or the attorney representing the new company
- or a third attorney that you went and found on your own
What do you think is the best way to go, if there is a best way to go?
Your response is highly appreciated.
Thanks,
If so, which attorney did you choose for the AC-21 paperwork?
- The old attorney, that represented you and your ex-employer, and filed your labor, 140, 485, EAD, AP
- or the attorney representing the new company
- or a third attorney that you went and found on your own
What do you think is the best way to go, if there is a best way to go?
Your response is highly appreciated.
Thanks,
sinha
01-06 09:14 PM
Hi!
I traveled to India and came back on 22nd Feb'2009. I am on EAD and travelled on AP.
At the immigration, I got I-94, which the officer stamped till Feb 21, 2010 (parolled until). However, my EAD is valid till (7th August,2010) 08/07/2010 (mm/dd/yyyy).I got my AP renewed till Dec'2010. Shall I be concerned about my I-94 till Feb21, 2010 (need to renew it?) or it doesn't matter as my AP is renewed and will renew my EAD 3 months before it expires? Pls answer.
Thanks.
I traveled to India and came back on 22nd Feb'2009. I am on EAD and travelled on AP.
At the immigration, I got I-94, which the officer stamped till Feb 21, 2010 (parolled until). However, my EAD is valid till (7th August,2010) 08/07/2010 (mm/dd/yyyy).I got my AP renewed till Dec'2010. Shall I be concerned about my I-94 till Feb21, 2010 (need to renew it?) or it doesn't matter as my AP is renewed and will renew my EAD 3 months before it expires? Pls answer.
Thanks.
Macaca
03-18 07:25 AM
Some paras from Congress's Oversight Offensive (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/03/16/AR2007031601989.html), By David S. Broder (http://projects.washingtonpost.com/staff/email/david+s.+broder/), Sunday, March 18, 2007
Ten weeks into the new Congress, it is clear that revelation, not legislation, is going to be its real product.
While President Bush threatens to use his veto pen to stop some bills and Senate Republicans block other measures from even reaching his desk, no force in Washington can halt the Democrats' investigative juggernaut from uncovering the secrets inside this administration.
For the first six years of the Bush administration, these aides were allowed free rein to carry out whatever policy or political assignments they wished -- or supposed that the president wanted done. A Congress under firm Republican control was somnolent when it came to oversight of the executive branch. No Republican committee chairman wanted to turn over rocks in a Republican administration.
You have to feel a twinge of sympathy now for the Bush appointees who suddenly find unsympathetic Democratic chairmen such as Henry Waxman, John Conyers, Patrick Leahy and Carl Levin investigating their cases. Even if those appointees are scrupulously careful about their actions now, who knows what subpoenaed memos and e-mails in their files will reveal about the past?
They will pay the price for the temporary breakdown in the system of checks and balances that occurred between 2001 and this year -- when the Republican Congress forgot its responsibility to hold the executive branch accountable.
It was a fundamental dereliction of duty by Congress, and it probably did more to encourage bad decisions and harmful actions by executive-branch political appointees than the much-touted lobbying influence. In reality, many Republican members of Congress did not mind what was happening because they were able to get favors done in that permissive climate. Now, the Democratic investigators will publicize instances of influence by members of Congress, and the political fallout will not stop with New Mexico's Pete Domenici and Heather Wilson.
Democrats find it easier to investigate than to legislate. With their major initiatives, from a minimum-wage boost to a shutdown of the Iraq war, stymied by Republican opposition, the Democrats are understandably making "accountability" their new goal -- meaning more and more investigations.
Fulfilling that promise, later in the week the House passed a series of bills that stripped some of the secrecy from executive branch documents and decisions.
Accountability is certainly important, but Democrats must know that people were really voting for action on Iraq, health care, immigration, energy and a few other problems. Investigations are useful, but only legislation on big issues changes lives.
Ten weeks into the new Congress, it is clear that revelation, not legislation, is going to be its real product.
While President Bush threatens to use his veto pen to stop some bills and Senate Republicans block other measures from even reaching his desk, no force in Washington can halt the Democrats' investigative juggernaut from uncovering the secrets inside this administration.
For the first six years of the Bush administration, these aides were allowed free rein to carry out whatever policy or political assignments they wished -- or supposed that the president wanted done. A Congress under firm Republican control was somnolent when it came to oversight of the executive branch. No Republican committee chairman wanted to turn over rocks in a Republican administration.
You have to feel a twinge of sympathy now for the Bush appointees who suddenly find unsympathetic Democratic chairmen such as Henry Waxman, John Conyers, Patrick Leahy and Carl Levin investigating their cases. Even if those appointees are scrupulously careful about their actions now, who knows what subpoenaed memos and e-mails in their files will reveal about the past?
They will pay the price for the temporary breakdown in the system of checks and balances that occurred between 2001 and this year -- when the Republican Congress forgot its responsibility to hold the executive branch accountable.
It was a fundamental dereliction of duty by Congress, and it probably did more to encourage bad decisions and harmful actions by executive-branch political appointees than the much-touted lobbying influence. In reality, many Republican members of Congress did not mind what was happening because they were able to get favors done in that permissive climate. Now, the Democratic investigators will publicize instances of influence by members of Congress, and the political fallout will not stop with New Mexico's Pete Domenici and Heather Wilson.
Democrats find it easier to investigate than to legislate. With their major initiatives, from a minimum-wage boost to a shutdown of the Iraq war, stymied by Republican opposition, the Democrats are understandably making "accountability" their new goal -- meaning more and more investigations.
Fulfilling that promise, later in the week the House passed a series of bills that stripped some of the secrecy from executive branch documents and decisions.
Accountability is certainly important, but Democrats must know that people were really voting for action on Iraq, health care, immigration, energy and a few other problems. Investigations are useful, but only legislation on big issues changes lives.
No comments:
Post a Comment