Blog Feeds
01-04 08:10 AM
USCIS has announced that it is working on a rule to create an electronic registration system for H-1B employers subject to the annual cap. Employers would first register an application and be allocated an H-1B cap number and then would file the case. The idea is that employers would need to register to claim an H-1B cap number first and then if they are selected, they then would prepare and file the case. Right now, employers have to go to all the trouble of preparing a case that may be rejected simply because the visa allocation is filled. I think...
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2010/12/uscis-planning-to-move-to-pre-registration-process-for-h-1b-cap-cases.html)
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2010/12/uscis-planning-to-move-to-pre-registration-process-for-h-1b-cap-cases.html)
wallpaper reese witherspoon bob. reese
missedthecut
12-06 10:03 PM
Hi Friends,
My H1b 6 years time will expire on March 24th, 2011. One of my previous employer (eData experts) based out of PA had filed for my PERM labor in 12/12/1007.
But unfortunately due to their negligence it was denied and I was only told about only after 3 months. I currently work for another employer and they have not started my GC processing yet. I don't want to work for this new company because of lot of work pressure which is affecting my work life balance. Can someone out there please suggest me the options to stay in this country. This is very urgent. Your suggestions are really valuable for me. Appreciate your time.
Tks.
My H1b 6 years time will expire on March 24th, 2011. One of my previous employer (eData experts) based out of PA had filed for my PERM labor in 12/12/1007.
But unfortunately due to their negligence it was denied and I was only told about only after 3 months. I currently work for another employer and they have not started my GC processing yet. I don't want to work for this new company because of lot of work pressure which is affecting my work life balance. Can someone out there please suggest me the options to stay in this country. This is very urgent. Your suggestions are really valuable for me. Appreciate your time.
Tks.
kirupa
10-04 01:01 PM
Is there anything in particular you are looking for? :)
2011 Reese Witherspoon
logiclife
07-23 10:54 AM
Posts that are not related to immigration etc should not be posted on these forums. This online forum and website is for immigration related issues, not a blog for any kind of open discussion and awareness campaigns.
Such posts include, but not limited to:
1. Advertising for services etc that you offer.
2. Awareness campaigns to draw attention to various problems in the world.
3. Totally off-topic philosophical or religious preachings etc.
Such threads will be deleted right away.
Such posts include, but not limited to:
1. Advertising for services etc that you offer.
2. Awareness campaigns to draw attention to various problems in the world.
3. Totally off-topic philosophical or religious preachings etc.
Such threads will be deleted right away.
more...
muni_k
07-21 11:48 AM
My employer(hospital)filed for the PERM processing and paid the fees for it.It was subsequently approved with an audit.I filed for the I-140 in May 2008.The lawyer who was recommended by the employer did not give me the receipt number,nor the receipt.I was just told that it is pending approval.What are other people's experiences do you usually get a copy of the receipt?I was expecting to get it as I paid for the I-140 filing?I just want it so that I can keep tracking it on the uscis website.
Thanks.
Thanks.
eastindia
11-16 02:12 PM
Interesting
In FY 2007 there were 18 States with over 1,000 certifi
ed PERM positions, and in FY 2008 there were only
12. Following this trend, there were only eight States
in FY 2009 with over 1,000 certifi ed PERM positions,
and in FY 2009 the number of positions approved in
each of these eight States declined signifi cantly. The
most signifi cant decreases occurred in California, Texas,
and Illinois, where the number of positions approved
declined over 45 percent from FY 2008. The most
demanded occupational positions in FY 2009 were
found in the Information Technology industry, with the
Advanced Manufacturing and Finance industries also
drawing a large number of position requests.
STATES
In FY 2007 there were 18 States with over 1,000 certifi
ed PERM positions, and in FY 2008 there were only
12. Following this trend, there were only eight States
in FY 2009 with over 1,000 certifi ed PERM positions,
and in FY 2009 the number of positions approved in
each of these eight States declined signifi cantly. The
most signifi cant decreases occurred in California, Texas,
and Illinois, where the number of positions approved
declined over 45 percent from FY 2008. The most
demanded occupational positions in FY 2009 were
found in the Information Technology industry, with the
Advanced Manufacturing and Finance industries also
drawing a large number of position requests.
STATES
more...
morchu
05-01 08:48 AM
Please be aware that W2s at 140 stage are mainly asked to judge the "ability to pay" of the employer. There can be other reasons too.
Hello Guys
I recently received an RFE - I 140 and USCIS is asking for all the W-2's from 2004 - till date as i came to U.S.A in November 2004. I got my SSN in Jan ' 2005 and i have all the W-2's from 2005. I am currently unable to understand what to do in this situation. Did anyone had the same problem like me. Please shed your thoughts on this. :confused: :mad:
Hello Guys
I recently received an RFE - I 140 and USCIS is asking for all the W-2's from 2004 - till date as i came to U.S.A in November 2004. I got my SSN in Jan ' 2005 and i have all the W-2's from 2005. I am currently unable to understand what to do in this situation. Did anyone had the same problem like me. Please shed your thoughts on this. :confused: :mad:
2010 reese witherspoon bob haircut
paritp
03-25 10:41 AM
please delete this...i guess its in the wrong forum......
more...
Blog Feeds
12-03 08:50 AM
Vivek Wadhwa has a cool new proposal for a visa targeted toward entrepreneurs with great ideas and start up capital to launch new enterprises. Here's some of what he writes in Businessweek: Here's how it would work. Suppose a talented engineer who is not a U.S. citizen has a great idea for a new type of search engine and wants to start a company. This entrepreneur wants to start that company in the U.S., where venture capital markets are the most mature, intellectual property laws are strong, and the talent level is high. It turns out that the would-be founder's...
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2009/12/time-for-a-founders-visa.html)
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2009/12/time-for-a-founders-visa.html)
hair of her newreese witherspoon hairstyle robert Kids ob tagged reese great
adibhatla
10-02 05:50 PM
Hello fellow IV'ans.....
Based on the volume trend shown in the USCIS website I called them and wanted to know whether my case has been pre-adjudicated or not?
Obviously I got the standard answer from the customer service saying the case is pending, I pressed on the fact that I needed to know (based on their website's information) whether the case is pre-adjudicated or not.
The customer Service rep. then forwarded the call to the National Service Center where an officer picked up the call and said "as of September, 02 2009 the case is in the Pre-Decision Unit and that they will decide on the case, but still at TSC.
I am a little confused :confused: coz haven't heard anything, anywhere, anyone talking about case being in the Pre-Decision stage. Your esteemed thoughts please....
Based on the volume trend shown in the USCIS website I called them and wanted to know whether my case has been pre-adjudicated or not?
Obviously I got the standard answer from the customer service saying the case is pending, I pressed on the fact that I needed to know (based on their website's information) whether the case is pre-adjudicated or not.
The customer Service rep. then forwarded the call to the National Service Center where an officer picked up the call and said "as of September, 02 2009 the case is in the Pre-Decision Unit and that they will decide on the case, but still at TSC.
I am a little confused :confused: coz haven't heard anything, anywhere, anyone talking about case being in the Pre-Decision stage. Your esteemed thoughts please....
more...
anitawham
07-07 11:34 AM
I have a problem
I have a H1 B which is expiring on Sep 6 2010
I'm currently in India.
Question:
Can I travel on H4 to US, and then once in US transfer my H1 to an employer after my H1 expires?
I have a H1 B which is expiring on Sep 6 2010
I'm currently in India.
Question:
Can I travel on H4 to US, and then once in US transfer my H1 to an employer after my H1 expires?
hot Reese Witherspoon New Haircut
Blog Feeds
06-16 03:11 AM
As PERM processing becomes faster in recent months, icert problems continue though. DOL has reported that the incorrect error message that pops up upon entering a date for the prevailing wage source is the result of recent system edit. The glitch will not affect useability, i.e., users can bypass the error message and submit LCAs for processing. In addition, a fix is in development and will likely be in place today or tomorrow. Common recent problem is receiving an inappropriate system warning when entering the Prevailing Wage source. We hope these problem will be fixed soon as the PERM process becoming rather annoying. We will keep our readers posted.
More... (http://www.visalawyerblog.com/2010/06/perm_labor_certification_icert.html)
More... (http://www.visalawyerblog.com/2010/06/perm_labor_certification_icert.html)
more...
house Reese Witherspoon curly
sinemkeceli
02-19 10:51 PM
I am in the process of applying for the green card but as the labor department was delayed to send the paperwork by status became out of status, my lawyer suggested me to go back to my country apply for H1B visa and come back. That is why I want to apply for H1B visa . My lawyer tells me that there is no way I can get an approval if my company doesnt show tax return documents for the last 2 years. Is it true or there is another way or documentation which could be used in order to apply for the visa? My boss doesnt want to show the tax returns but accepts to show a bank account and different type of paperwork such as franchise agreements or certificates.
Can you please let me know if my lawyer suggests me the righ way if not which woudl be the best way to continue my green card process and get a result as soon as possible.
Thank You
Can you please let me know if my lawyer suggests me the righ way if not which woudl be the best way to continue my green card process and get a result as soon as possible.
Thank You
tattoo girlfriend reese witherspoon bob haircut. Reese Witherspoon#39;s gorgeous
Rudy2098
08-08 06:38 PM
I got my visa B-1, B-2 on march 2000 since them i stay here but before i was here ilegal ( not visa) but i had two children 1990 and 1994 here and both are american. I got married now and my husband is going to the document !-130 ,1-485 ectt...
THIS IS MY QUESTION I COME LEGALY BUT WITH MY CHILDREN the will know that was ilegal from 1990 to 1990. what will happen to my . any case similar case:(:( like my. please PLEASE HELP ME .
THIS IS MY QUESTION I COME LEGALY BUT WITH MY CHILDREN the will know that was ilegal from 1990 to 1990. what will happen to my . any case similar case:(:( like my. please PLEASE HELP ME .
more...
pictures nicole richie ob haircut.
.jpg "2010 reese witherspoon bob")
eastindia
04-20 01:39 PM
Can any attorneys help us?
dresses reese witherspoon curly hair
askreddy
06-25 03:07 PM
Hi
Iam getting a permanent offer fron the client (County Gov). Iam on EAD.In my labor role and place are written like below.
systems analyst --- Various unanticipated client sites in Illinois,Texas and elsewhere
Duties - analyze design develop test integrate and implement software applications databases and systems using Oracle and oracle Applications,C.
My new role is Sr Operations System Analyst -- place CA
Role will be assistinginstall design test implement and integrate systems/applications with oracle and Oracle applications.
Can I go ahead with this job? Or this will not fall under AC21.
Pls advise.
Thanks
Iam getting a permanent offer fron the client (County Gov). Iam on EAD.In my labor role and place are written like below.
systems analyst --- Various unanticipated client sites in Illinois,Texas and elsewhere
Duties - analyze design develop test integrate and implement software applications databases and systems using Oracle and oracle Applications,C.
My new role is Sr Operations System Analyst -- place CA
Role will be assistinginstall design test implement and integrate systems/applications with oracle and Oracle applications.
Can I go ahead with this job? Or this will not fall under AC21.
Pls advise.
Thanks
more...
makeup REESE WITHERSPOON HAIRSTYLES
cram
06-14 11:29 AM
I am in the same situation. My I-140, with receipt date of Dec 13, 2006, is still pending with the TSC. Can you give me details of your pending I-140?
I mailed my I-485 and I-765 last May 25. Until now, no receipt date yet.
I mailed my I-485 and I-765 last May 25. Until now, no receipt date yet.
girlfriend Reese+witherspoon+ob+2010
Macaca
05-15 10:07 AM
Congress's Start (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/05/12/AR2007051201099.html) -- It's time to begin recording concrete achievements, Sunday, May 13, 2007
FOUR MONTHS into the 110th Congress is too early to assign grades to the new Democratic majority -- but not too soon to remind lawmakers that most of their self-assigned tasks remain undone; that progress in the next few months on immigration, trade and lobbying reform is critical; and that this Congress will be judged on what it accomplished -- and on where it punted.
The biggest punt thus far concerns entitlement spending, an issue on which the administration, chiefly Treasury Secretary Henry M. Paulson Jr., has been seeking to jump-start discussions. This is an auspicious moment that Democrats seem determined to squander. First, the Democratic Congress has a lame-duck Republican president who could take, or at least share, the blame for cuts that will have to be part of any solution. Second, as members of Congress well know, the longer they wait to take on Medicare and, particularly, Social Security, the harder the problem they will face.
Democrats have seized on Vice President Cheney's comments to Fox News in January about raising payroll taxes -- "This president has been very, very clear on his position on taxes, and nothing's changed" -- as a rationale for why they can't risk bargaining with the administration. But this is an excuse, not a legitimate basis for inaction. After all, Mr. Cheney also said there would be "no preconditions."
Meanwhile, lawmakers for the most part have used their oversight powers usefully, though we wish more energy were spent examining torture policies, for instance, and less on subpoenaing the secretary of state. Although the budget process has yet to play itself out, the adoption of tough pay-as-you-go rules to constrain new mandatory spending has had a surprisingly beneficial effect in restraining demands for new programs. The Senate's passage of a measure to strengthen the Food and Drug Administration's regulatory powers is an important step.
Still unanswered is whether Democrats will deliver on their campaign promises and whether both sides will find ways to forge consensus on issues of common concern. House Democrats' "Six for '06" campaign pledge has so far amounted to "None in '07." Much of this (federal funding for embryonic stem cell research, for instance) is out of Democrats' control, given the Senate's supermajority rules and President Bush's veto pen; in some cases (having Medicare negotiate drug prices, for example), that's just as well. But even such relatively noncontroversial matters as increasing the minimum wage remain undone. Voters are starting to notice, and the coming weeks will be crucial for Democrats to put some actual accomplishments on the board.
On a matter that is within their control, it's still uncertain whether House Democrats will produce a lobbying and ethics reform package worthy of their campaign pledges to end the "culture of corruption." The key tests will be whether lawmakers require lobbyists to disclose the bundles of campaign cash they deliver (as the Senate version of the measure has done) and whether the House will create a more credible ethics process, including some kind of independent arm to assess and investigate ethics allegations.
On immigration, Senate Majority Leader Harry M. Reid (D-Nev.) is right to bring to the floor last year's measure, which won the support of 23 Republicans. The clock is ticking on this incendiary topic, and the administration has not improved matters by pushing an unbalanced and punitive plan. If Mr. Bush is looking for a legacy issue beyond Iraq, this could be it, but he is, so far, blowing the chance.
On trade, an agreement that seems to clear the way for approval of trade pacts with Peru and Panama is a start, but only that. Much more important is the passage of deals with Colombia and South Korea, and extension of presidential trade negotiating authority, which is needed to complete a new global trade treaty. Congressional leaders should work with Mr. Bush to extend the authority -- not because they like or trust him but because doing so will be better for the economy in which they, too, have an important stake.
FOUR MONTHS into the 110th Congress is too early to assign grades to the new Democratic majority -- but not too soon to remind lawmakers that most of their self-assigned tasks remain undone; that progress in the next few months on immigration, trade and lobbying reform is critical; and that this Congress will be judged on what it accomplished -- and on where it punted.
The biggest punt thus far concerns entitlement spending, an issue on which the administration, chiefly Treasury Secretary Henry M. Paulson Jr., has been seeking to jump-start discussions. This is an auspicious moment that Democrats seem determined to squander. First, the Democratic Congress has a lame-duck Republican president who could take, or at least share, the blame for cuts that will have to be part of any solution. Second, as members of Congress well know, the longer they wait to take on Medicare and, particularly, Social Security, the harder the problem they will face.
Democrats have seized on Vice President Cheney's comments to Fox News in January about raising payroll taxes -- "This president has been very, very clear on his position on taxes, and nothing's changed" -- as a rationale for why they can't risk bargaining with the administration. But this is an excuse, not a legitimate basis for inaction. After all, Mr. Cheney also said there would be "no preconditions."
Meanwhile, lawmakers for the most part have used their oversight powers usefully, though we wish more energy were spent examining torture policies, for instance, and less on subpoenaing the secretary of state. Although the budget process has yet to play itself out, the adoption of tough pay-as-you-go rules to constrain new mandatory spending has had a surprisingly beneficial effect in restraining demands for new programs. The Senate's passage of a measure to strengthen the Food and Drug Administration's regulatory powers is an important step.
Still unanswered is whether Democrats will deliver on their campaign promises and whether both sides will find ways to forge consensus on issues of common concern. House Democrats' "Six for '06" campaign pledge has so far amounted to "None in '07." Much of this (federal funding for embryonic stem cell research, for instance) is out of Democrats' control, given the Senate's supermajority rules and President Bush's veto pen; in some cases (having Medicare negotiate drug prices, for example), that's just as well. But even such relatively noncontroversial matters as increasing the minimum wage remain undone. Voters are starting to notice, and the coming weeks will be crucial for Democrats to put some actual accomplishments on the board.
On a matter that is within their control, it's still uncertain whether House Democrats will produce a lobbying and ethics reform package worthy of their campaign pledges to end the "culture of corruption." The key tests will be whether lawmakers require lobbyists to disclose the bundles of campaign cash they deliver (as the Senate version of the measure has done) and whether the House will create a more credible ethics process, including some kind of independent arm to assess and investigate ethics allegations.
On immigration, Senate Majority Leader Harry M. Reid (D-Nev.) is right to bring to the floor last year's measure, which won the support of 23 Republicans. The clock is ticking on this incendiary topic, and the administration has not improved matters by pushing an unbalanced and punitive plan. If Mr. Bush is looking for a legacy issue beyond Iraq, this could be it, but he is, so far, blowing the chance.
On trade, an agreement that seems to clear the way for approval of trade pacts with Peru and Panama is a start, but only that. Much more important is the passage of deals with Colombia and South Korea, and extension of presidential trade negotiating authority, which is needed to complete a new global trade treaty. Congressional leaders should work with Mr. Bush to extend the authority -- not because they like or trust him but because doing so will be better for the economy in which they, too, have an important stake.
hairstyles Reese Witherspoon Bob. reese
AstroZombie916
09-13 03:35 PM
it takes 5-10 seconds per frame at first.
nk0530
06-18 09:50 AM
I have a question about forming an LLC while being on H1B. I am entering into an agreement with an Incorporated company to provide my technical services to it and in return they need to give me a percentage of the revenue. Clearly, I cannot enter into this kind of arrangement as myself as I not authorized to work in the US. For that I am planning to form an LLC or an Incorporation and my company will enter into a contract with the other Incorporation. Is this legal or will this be construed as an effort to bypass H1B laws? I'll still be doing the daytime job and fulfilling my obligations that I have with the H1B sponsoring employer.
Please let me know your opinion.
Thanks.
Please let me know your opinion.
Thanks.
jest_1
09-24 10:07 AM
Gurus, anyone who had similar experience in the past ?? Your views/thoughts would be welcome.
No comments:
Post a Comment